Stroke clinical trials at UC Davis

Primary Aim: To determine if apixaban is superior to aspirin for prevention of the composite outcome of any stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic) or death from any cause in patients with recent ICH and atrial fibrillation (AF). Secondary Aim: To determine if apixaban, compared with aspirin, results in better functional outcomes as measured by the modified Rankin Scale.

The Connect-One Study is an early feasibility study to obtain preliminary device safety information for the Connexus Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). The Connexus BCI is intended to be used as: (1) an assistive communication device to decode imagined language correlates and speech for patients with impaired communication as a result of severe loss of voluntary motor control; and (2) to provide control of computer devices for individuals with severe loss of voluntary motor control of the upper extremity.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of JX10 versus placebo in participants with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) who present for care within 4.5 to 24 hours. The main question the study aims to answer are: 1. JX10 improves functional outcomes as measured by the modified Rankin Scale score when compared with placebo following AIS. 2. Risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage of JX10 in participants with AIS. During Part 1, participants will be randomized to JX 10 (1mg/kg, 3 mg/kg) or placebo. During Part 2, participants will receive JX10 (optimal dose chosen from Part 1) or placebo.

The objective of the rFVIIa for Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke Administered at Earliest Time (FASTEST) Trial is to establish the first treatment for acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) within a time window and subgroup of patients that is most likely to benefit. The central hypothesis is that rFVIIa, administered within 120 minutes from stroke onset with an identified subgroup of patients most likely to benefit, will improve outcomes at 90 days as measured by the Modified Rankin Score (mRS) and decrease ongoing bleeding as compared to standard therapy. FASTEST Part 2 is an extension of the FASTEST Trial where the subgroups include those treated within 2 hours with a positive spot sign on a baseline CT angiogram or patients treated within 90 minutes of stroke onset, with or without a positive spot sign.

The purpose of this research, which has been determined as non-significant risk by the central IRB overseeing the study, is to obtain information to help further develop a machine (a medical device) to measure the pressure around the brain from the outside (this pressure is called intracranial pressure or ICP). Monitoring and managing ICP is an important part of care for patients with conditions such as Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). However, the current way of measuring ICP requires surgery to drill a hole into the skull, and therefore can introduce additional risks such as infections and pain. Recent research has shown it may be possible to measure ICP without needing surgery. This technology is in development, but large amounts of data is required to build these new devices. Through collecting a large database of information from patients who have both the routine surgical device and the research device applied to their head, the research team will work to develop and test an effective and potentially safer way of monitoring patient ICP.

Stroke remains the leading cause of severe disability, and survivors frequently have incomplete recovery. More than half of older survivors have impaired mobility which contributes to poorer quality-of-life (QoL) and suffering. The annual rate of disability compared to myocardial infarction triples, and stroke accelerates natural age-related functional decline. Somatic dysfunction (SD) is impaired function of the body framework identified by physical examination. Few studies have rigorously studied SD among stroke survivors. We recently demonstrated the reliability of a novel, more construct valid osteopathic examination methodology [called the Functional Pathology of the Musculoskeletal System (FPMSS) model] to quantify SD among asymptomatic participants and patients with acute cerebral ischemia. The preliminary findings suggest that dysfunction may develop within the first week after acute ischemic stroke (IS) and be more severe among those with paralysis compared to healthy volunteers. The precise pathophysiologic mechanism underlying SD remains unknown. The objective of this proposal is to establish the relationship between SD severity during chronic stroke recovery and physiologic biomarkers. The central hypothesis is that SD is quantifiable, correlates with biomarkers that reflect functional status, and is associated with QoL among chronic stroke survivors. There are currently no biomarkers that correlate with SD severity after IS. Establishing valid biomarkers associated with physiologic processes that are otherwise inferred by physical examination would allow for quantification of changes in response to treatment (e.g., osteopathic manipulative treatment; OMT) aimed at restoring economical biomechanical function. Testing this hypothesis will address several fundamental gaps in knowledge about osteopathic palpatory diagnosis, physiologic processes associated with SD, and its association with survivor outcomes. Until these knowledge gaps are filled, optimal strategies to complement stroke recovery in patients with neurological disability cannot fully be determined. The project specific aims are to quantify the association between SD among chronic (>3 months) IS survivors and measured (1) energy expenditure, (2) heart rate variability (HRV), and (3) patient-reported outcome (PRO) health domains. The proposed research is significant because it will establish a novel osteopathic approach that determines the impact of whole musculoskeletal system (MSS) health on QoL among stroke survivors living with chronic disability and correlate physiologic properties related to SD. This approach will allow us to quantify SD and show meaningful associations with autonomic function, biomechanical economy, and QoL after chronic stroke. These new metrics would then be derived in stroke patients to determine SD and physiologic thresholds for those that would benefit most from OMT in a future trial. This proposal is innovative in that it seeks to shift current research and practice paradigms by re-appraising the impact of whole musculoskeletal functional economy on patient-centered outcomes among stroke survivors. Methodologically, use of the FPMSS model represents a novel, more construct valid, diagnostic paradigm to reliably identify SD and establish an osteopathic, cross-disciplinary approach to the field of stroke research. The model examines the MSS as integrated, highlighting proportionate, not merely symmetrical, posture and motion among survivors with chronic disability. Similarly, PROs have been used to quantify health status after stroke, but have not been used to study the relationship between chronic neurologic impairment and SD. Integrating contemporary patient-centered stroke outcomes, rigorous osteopathic assessment, and analysis of physiologic processes will advance our understanding of how musculoskeletal dysfunction impacts QoL after stroke.